S.P. Gaskill, S.R.G. Went
Reliability Engineering and System
Safety, 53, 1996
Summary
Industrial
Robot design and selection is today closely related with the robot's final
application and its integration with the other machines, several hazard aspects
are involved due to movements and high energy.
One extreme difficulty in
taking decisions related to safety is the fact that all robots use programmable
electronic systems (defined with the acronym PES), which are complex to
evaluate. Programmable Electronic Systems are reliable and offer a wide
functionality, wider than hard wired control systems, however they are complex
and it may be impossible to give any prediction regarding safety, since
systematic failures, especially software faults, could cause unexpected actions
from the device.
For this reason in
EN60204-1:1993 sub clause 12.3.5, 'Safety
of Machinery - Electrical Equipment of Machines: Part 1 "General
Requirement"', there is a preference for hard-wired electro-mechanical
components for emergency stop functions; where this is not possible other
measures should be used (for example self diagnostic checking features). On
June 14th 1989 the European Community signed the Machinery Directive (in UK it
is known as "The Supply of Machinery
Regulations 1992"), which today is the basic directive in the robotic
field, requiring that certain technical documentation, including the technical
construction file, must be available any time for inspection.
At present every robot
maker has to provide the proper documentation, including conformity about the
integration in the cell where the robot is installed, also all documents must
be available within at least 10 year from the first machine's operation.
The European Law in the
mentioned regulation is providing an appendix, the EHSR (Essential Health and
Safety Requirements), where general terms are reported for operators’ safety. Currently
the EN775:1992 (ISO 10219) ‘Manipulating
Industrial Robots – Safety’, bases technical measures for preventions of
accidents on two principles: 1)Absence of people in the safeguard space during
automatic operation; 2) the elimination of hazards or at least their reduction
during interventions (e.g., teaching program verification) in the safeguards
space.
Acceptable levels of
safety are regulated by IEC1508 'Functional
safety: safety-related systems', which tends to minimize risk, but still today tests and trials are not enough to prove
the safety of a robots and therefore a risk based, quality approach throughout
the lifecycle of the machine is performed.
In the international
standard IEC1508, systematic errors are taken under consideration under the
concept of "target safety integrity
levels", which are chosen according to the amount of risk reduction
attributed to the related system in order to reduce the overall risk to a
tolerable level.
In the European Union law
there are primarily two ways to conform the technical measure required:
Designer are assisted by
the standard EN292, ‘Safety of Machinery
- Basic Concepts for design’, interpreting EHSRs (Essential Health and
Safety Requirements) guiding the producer through: determining the boundary of
the system (space, time), identifying and describing the nature and consequences
of the constraints of the system (specially hazards related with human robot
interaction during the life cycle of the robot), assigning a risk level for
each possible hazard and finally ensuring that safety is adequate.
Safeguarding is regulated
by EN775 'Manipulating Industrial Robots
- Safety" where prevention of accidents is based on two fundamental
principles: absence of people in the safeguard space during automatic
operations; elimination of hazards or at least their reduction during
interventions (such as teaching program verification) in the safeguard space. The
standard, based on different steps, uses safety lifecycle as a key framework
defining: objectives to be achieved, requirements to meet the objective, the
scope of each phase, the required inputs for each phase and the deliverable to
comply with the requirements.
Key
Concepts
Standards and Regulations
No comments:
Post a Comment